How to Know When to Go to Hospital When Baby Hit Head

Authored by Kit Chivalry via Off-Guardian.org,

You asked for it, so we made information technology. A collection of all the arguments y'all'll ever demand.

We get a lot of e-mails and private messages along these lines"practise yous take a source for X?" or"tin can you point me to mask studies?" or"I know I saw a graph for bloodshed, but I can't find information technology anymore". And we empathize, it's been a long 18 months, and there are and so many statistics and numbers to endeavor and go on direct in your head.

And then, to bargain with all these requests, we decided to make a bullet-pointed and sourced listing for all the key points. A one-stop-store.

Here are key facts and sources about the alleged "pandemic", that will help you get a grasp on what has happened to the globe since Jan 2020, and help you lot enlighten any of your friends who might be still trapped in the New Normal fog: "Covid deaths" – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – "asymptomatic infection" – Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines – Deception & Foreknowledge

*  *  *

Office I: "COVID DEATHS" & Mortality

ane. The survival rate of "Covid" is over 99%. Authorities medical experts went out of their fashion to underline, from the beginning of the pandemic, thatthe vast majority of the population are not in any danger from Covid.

Nearly all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid have returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning Covid'southward survival charge per unit is at to the lowest degree 99.5%.

*

2. At that place has been NO unusual excess bloodshed. The press has called 2020 the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland's "deadliest twelvemonth since world war two", but this is misleading because it ignores the massive increase in the population since that fourth dimension. A more reasonable statistical measure of mortality is Historic period-Standardised Mortality Charge per unit (ASMR):

Past this measure, 2020 isn't even the worst year for mortalitysince 2000, In fact since 1943only 9 years have been better than 2020.

Similarly, in the US the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality beyond Western Europe and the US click here. What increases in mortality we have seen could be attributable to non-Covid causes [facts 7, ix & 19].

*

iii. "Covid death" counts are artificially inflated. Countries around the earth accept been defining a "Covid death" as a"expiryby any cause inside 28/30/60 days of a positive test".

Healthcare officials from Italian republic, Germany, the UK, US, Northern Republic of ireland and others have all admitted to this practice:

Removing any distinction betwixt dyingof Covid, and dying of something elselater on testing positive for Covid will naturally lead to over-counting of "Covid deaths". British pathologist Dr John Lee was warning of this "substantial over-estimate" as early on equally last spring. Other mainstream sources take reported information technology, too.

Considering the huge percentage of "asymptomatic" Covid infections [14], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and the potential for faux-positive tests [fact 18], this renders the Covid expiry numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.

*

4. The vast bulk of covid deaths have serious comorbidities. In March 2020, the Italian government published statistics showing 99.2% of their "Covid deaths" had at least one serious comorbidity.

These included cancer, heart disease, dementia, Alzheimer'southward, kidney failure and diabetes (amidst others). Over 50% of them had3 or more serious pre-existing conditions.

This pattern has held up in all other countries over the course of the "pandemic". An October 2020 FOIA request to the UK's ONS revealed less than 10% of the official "Covid death" count at that time had Covid as the sole cause of expiry.

*

five. Average age of "Covid decease" is greater than the average life expectancy. The average historic period of a "Covid expiry" in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italian republic it's 86. Federal republic of germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The The states, 78, Australia, 82.

In almost all cases the median age of a "Covid expiry"is higher than the national life expectancy.

Equally such, for nigh of the world, the "pandemic" has had little-to-no touch on on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the U.s. in just over a year. [source]

*

6. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality curve. Statistical studies from the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and Republic of india accept shown that the curve for "Covid death" follows the curve for expected mortality almost exactly:

The risk of death "from Covid" follows, well-nigh exactly, your groundwork gamble of death in full general.

The pocket-sized increase for some of the older age groups can be accounted for by other factors.[facts 7, 9 & 19]

*

7. There has been a massive increment in the use of "unlawful" DNRs. Watchdogs and authorities agencies have reported huge increases in the use of Practice Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the terminal twenty months.

In the US, hospitals considered "universal DNRs" for any patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses have admitted the DNR system was abused in New York.

In the UK there was an "unprecdented" rise in "illegal" DNRs for disabled people, GP surgeries sent out letters to non-terminal patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed "blanket DNRs" forunabridged nursing homes.

A study done by Sheffield Univerisity found over one-third of all "suspected" Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file within 24 hours of hospital admission.

Coating use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any increases in mortality in 2020/21.[Facts 2 & six]

*  *  *

PART II: LOCKDOWNS

8. Lockdowns do not prevent the spread of disease. In that location is picayune to no evidence lockdowns have any impact on limiting "Covid deaths". If you compare regions that locked down to regions that did non, y'all can encounter no pattern at all.

"Covid deaths" in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

"Covid deaths" in Sweden (no lockdown) vs United kingdom (lockdown)

*

9. Lockdowns impale people. There is potent evidence that lockdowns – through social, economical and other public health damage – are deadlier than the "virus".

Dr David Nabarro, World Wellness Organization special envoy for Covid-19 described lockdowns every bit a "global ending" in October 2020:

We inthe Globe Wellness Organization exercise not advocate lockdowns as the main ways of control of the virus[…] it seems we may have a doubling of world poverty past next year. We may well accept at least a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe."

A UN study from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being killed by the economic bear on of lockdowns, while tens of millions more confront possible poverty and famine.

Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other social/mental health crises are spiking all over the world. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to run into increased mortality from heart affliction, cancer et al. in the near future.

The impact of lockdown would business relationship for the small increases in excess mortality [Facts 2 & 6]

*

ten. Hospitals were never unusually over-encumbered. the principal argument used to defend lockdowns is that "flattening the curve" would forestall a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from plummet. But most healthcare systems were never close to collapse at all.

In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Espana and Italia were over-flowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017 Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients sleeping in corridors. A newspaper JAMA newspaper from March 2020 constitute that Italian hospitals"typically run at 85-90% chapters in the winter months".

In the UK, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the winter.

As part of their Covid policy, the NHS appear in Spring of 2020 that they would be"re-organizing hospital capacity in new ways to treat Covid and non-Covid patients separately" and that "equally result hospitals will experience capacity pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously have been the case."

This means they removed thousands of beds.  During an alleged deadly pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu flavor, and at times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.

In both the UK and United states of america millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were never used.

*  *  *

PART Three: PCR TESTS

eleven. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose affliction. The Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Concatenation Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the "gold standard" for Covid diagnosis. But the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:

PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you lot or anything like that."

*

12. PCR Tests have a history of being inaccurate and unreliable. The "gold standard" PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a lot of imitation-positive results, past reacting to Deoxyribonucleic acid cloth that is not specific to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese study found the same patient could become two different results from the aforementioned test on the same day. In Federal republic of germany, tests are known to take reacted to mutual common cold viruses. A 2006 study found PCR tests for 1 virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an "outbreak" of Whooping Cough that never actually existed. Some tests in the U.s.a. even reacted to the negative control sample.

The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came dorsum positive for the virus.

As early as February of 2020 experts were admitting the exam was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences told Chinese state tv set"The accurateness of the tests is only 30-l%". The Australian government's own website claimed"There is limited testify available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests." And a Portuguese court ruled that PCR tests were"unreliable" and should not be used for diagnosis.

You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here, here and hither.

*

xiii. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high. PCR tests are run in cycles, the number of cycles you use to become your result is known as your "cycle threshold" or CT value. Kary Mullis said:"If you have to go more than 40 cycles[…]at that place is something seriously wrong with your PCR."

The MIQE PCR guidelines concord, stating:"[CT] values higher than forty are doubtable because of the unsaid low efficiency and generally should not be reported," Dr Fauci himself even admitted anything over 35 cycles is almost never culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times:Whatever exam with a bicycle threshold to a higher place 35 is as well sensitive…I'm shocked that people would think that twoscore [cycles] could represent a positive…A more than reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35″.

In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard School of Public Health, said the limit should exist 30, and the author goes on to point out that reducing the CT from 40 to thirty would accept reduced "covid cases" in some states by as much as 90%.

The CDC'southward own information suggests no sample over 33 cycles could exist cultured, and Germany's Robert Koch Institute says zilch over 30 cycles is likely to be infectious.

Despite this, information technology is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at least 37 cycles and sometimes equally high as 45. The NHS "standard operating procedure" for PCR tests rules ready the limit at 40 cycles.

Based on what nosotros know about the CT values, the bulk of PCR test results are at best questionable.

*

14. The World Health Organization (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced imitation positives.In December 2020 WHO put out a conference memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of loftier CT values causing simulated positive results:

when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background dissonance and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this fourth dimension warning that "asymptomatic" positive PCR tests should exist re-tested because they might be simulated positives:

Where examination results do non correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or dissimilar NAT engineering.

*

15. The scientific basis for Covid tests is questionable. The genome of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced by Chinese scientists in December 2019, then published on January tenth 2020. Less than two weeks afterwards, German virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a paper,Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on Jan 21st 2020, and so accustomed on January 22nd. Meaning the paper wasallegedly "peer-reviewed" in less than 24 hours. A procedure that typically takes weeks.

Since and so, a consortium of over forty life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper's methodology.

They take also requested the release of the journal'southward peer-review report, to prove the paper actually did laissez passer through the peer-review process. The journal has all the same to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.

*  *  *

PART Iv: "ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION"

sixteen. The majority of Covid infections are "asymptomatic". From every bit early as March 2020, studies done in Italy were suggesting 50-75% of positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Another United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland study from August 2020 found as much as 86% of "Covid patients"experienced no viral symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the difference between an "asymptomatic case" and a false-positive examination result.

*

17. At that place is very little evidence supporting the alleged danger of "asymptomatic transmission". In June 2020, Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO'southward emerging diseases and zoonosis unit of measurement, said:

From the data nosotros have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person really transmits onward to a secondary private,"

A meta-assay of Covid studies, published by Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in Dec 2020, establish that asymptomatic carriers had a less than 1% chance of infecting people within their household. Another written report, done on influenza in 2009, found:

…limited evidence to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic] transmission. The role of asymptomatic or presymptomatic flu-infected individuals in affliction transmission may accept been overestimated…"

Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many "asymptomatic cases" may be false positives.[fact 14]

*  *  *

Role 5: VENTILATORS

18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses. Mechanical ventilation is non, and never has been, recommended treatment for respiratory infection of whatsoever kind. In the early days of the pandemic, many doctors came forward questioning the use of ventilators to care for "Covid".

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:

Ventilators practice not cure any illness. They tin fill your lungs with air when you find yourself unable to do then yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the public's consciousness, but this is not in fact their most common or most appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Association of Pneumatological Clinics said:

When we read the first studies and reports from Communist china and Italy, we immediately asked ourselves why intubation was so common there.This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all "recommended" Covid patients be ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods.

This was not a medical policy designed to best treat the patients, but rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets.

*

19. Ventilators killed people. Putting someone who is suffering from influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary affliction, or any other condition which restricts breathing or affects the lungs, will not alleviate any of those symptoms. In fact, information technology will most certainly make it worse, and will impale many of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known every bit "ventilator-associated pneumonia", which studies testify affects up to 28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills xx-55% of those infected.

Mechanical ventilation is too dissentious to the physical structure of the lungs, resulting in "ventilator-induced lung injury", which can dramatically affect quality of life, and even result in death.

Experts estimate 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their disease. Around the world, between 66 and 86% of all "Covid patients" put on ventilators died.

According to the "undercover nurse", ventilators were being used and then improperly in New York, they were destroying patients' lungs:

This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder at worst. This misuse of ventilators could business relationship for any increment in mortality in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *

PART VI: MASKS

20. Masks don't work. At least a dozen scientific studies have shown that masks exercise aught to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-analysis published by the CDC in May 2020 found"no meaning reduction in flu transmission with the use of face masks".

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks"did not seem to be constructive against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection."

There are literally too many to quote them all, but y'all tin read them: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][eight][ix][x] Or read a summary by SPR hither.

While some studies have been washed claiming to show mask practice work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. One relied on self-reported surveys every bit data. Some other was so badly designed a panel of experts demand it be withdrawn. A tertiary was withdrawn afterward its predictions proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO commissioned their ain meta-analysis in the Lancet, just that written report looked merely at N95 masks and only in hospitals. [For full run down on the bad data in this study click here.]

Aside from scientific evidence, at that place's plenty of real-world testify that masks do nothing to halt the spread of illness.

For example, North Dakota and South Dakota had virtually-identical case figures, despite i having a mask-mandate and the other not:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid "cases" than countieswith mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst influenza outbreak in decades in 2019.

*

21. Masks are bad for your health. Wearing a mask for long periods, wearing the same mask more than once, and other aspects of cloth masks can be bad for your wellness. A long study on the detrimental furnishings of mask-wearing was recently published past theInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Dr. James Meehan reported in Baronial 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are also known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.

Childen wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in facial deformities.

People effectually the earth accept passed out due to CO2 poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in Prc even suffered sudden cardiac arrest.

*

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of disposable masks have been used per month for over a year. A report from the Un found the Covid19 pandemic will likely outcome in plastic waste more than than doubling in the next few years., and the vast bulk of that is face masks.

The report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste material) will clog sewage and irrigation systems, which will have knock on furnishings on public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A study from the University of Swansea found"heavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-away masks were submerged in water." These materials are toxic to both people and wild fauna.

*  *  *

Function 7: VACCINES

23. Covid "vaccines" are totally unprecedented. Before 2020 no successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been developed. Since then nosotros have allegedlyfabricated 20 of them in xviii months.

Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with fiddling success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Meaning that vaccinated mice could potentially go the diseasemore severely than unvaccinated mice. Another try caused liver impairment in ferrets.

While traditional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the disease, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) vaccines theoretically work past injecting viral mRNA into the trunk, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your trunk to recognise, and make antigens for, the "spike proteins" of the virus. They have been the subject of research since the 1990s, merely earlier 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever approved for utilise.

*

24. Vaccines do non confer immunity or forestall transmission. It is readily admitted that Covid "vaccines" donon confer amnesty from infection and donot prevent you lot from passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an article in the British Medical Periodical highlighted that the vaccine studies were not designed to fifty-fifty endeavor and assess if the "vaccines" limited transmission.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA factor therapies, were quite clear their product's "efficacy" was based on "reducing the severity of symptoms".

*

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm effects.Vaccine development is a slow, laborious procedure. Usually, from evolution through testing and finally beingness approved for public use takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid were all adult and approved in less than a year. Obviously there tin can exist no long-term condom data on chemicals which are less than a year old.

Pfizer fifty-fifty admit this is true in the leaked supply contract between the pharmaceutical giant, and the government of Albania:

the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are non currently known and that at that place may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known

Further, none of the vaccines have been subject to proper trials. Many of them skipped early-phase trials entirely, and the belatedly-stage human trials have either not been peer-reviewed, have not released their information, will not finish until 2023 or were abased afterwards "astringent adverse effects".

*

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal indemnity should they cause harm. The USA's Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Deed (PREP) grants immunity until at least 2024.

The Eu's product licensing law does the same, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with vaccine manufacturers.

The Great britain went fifty-fifty further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the government, and any employees thereof, for whatsoever impairment done when a patient is being treated for Covid19 or "suspected Covid19".

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least, fabricated this indemnity a standard demand of supplying Covid vaccines:

Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and concur harmless Pfizer […] from and confronting any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses

*  *  *

Function VIII: Deception & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The European union was preparing "vaccine passports" at to the lowest degree a YEAR earlier the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency measures, accept existed since before the emergence of the disease.

Two Eu documents published in 2018, the"2018 State of Vaccine Conviction" and a technical study titled"Designing and implementing an immunisation information organisation" discussed the plausibility of an Eu-wide vaccination monitoring system.

These documents were combined into the 2019 "Vaccination Roadmap", which (amidst other things) established a "feasibility study" on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This report's final conclusions were released to the public in September 2019, but a calendar month before Event 201 (beneath).

*

28. A "preparation practice" predicted the pandemic merely weeks before information technology started. In October 2019 the World Economical Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Result 201. This was a training exercise based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.

The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a "call to activity". I month afterward, People's republic of china recorded their first example of "Covid".

*

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Flu has "disappeared". In the United States, since Februart 2020, flu cases take allegedly dropped past over 98%.

It'south non simply the US either, globally flu has apparently nigh completely disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease called "Covid", which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality rate to influenza, is supposedly sweeping the globe.

*

30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the beginning of lockdown the wealthiest people take become significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created "fighting the coronavirus", with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.

Business Insider reported that"billionaires saw their internet worth increase past half a trillion dollars" past October 2020.

Conspicuously that number will be even bigger past at present.

*  *  *

These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented hither as a resources to help formulate and support your arguments with friends or strangers. Thanks to all the researchers who have collated and collected this information over the last twenty months, especially Swiss Policy Inquiry.

venegasthestive.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/30-facts-you-need-know-covid-cribsheet

Share this post